Free Solved Assignment IGNOU MHI-109 INDIAL NATIONAL MOVEMENT Current Year 2024-2025 Pdf

Free Solved Assignment IGNOU MHI-109 INDIAL NATIONAL MOVEMENT Current Year 2024-2025 Pdf

Last Date of Submission Ignou Solved Assignment Files 2024-2025 Handwritten Complete Files at Study Centre Before due date that is mentioned below -

1. July 2024 Session Students 31st March 2025 (Who has taken admission before May/June 2024 and wants to appeare June 2025 Examination)

2. January 2025 Session Students 30th September 2025 (Who has taken admission After June 2024 and wants to appeare October/November 2025 Examination)

You should note that the submission of assignments is compulsory before taking up Term-end
Examination. It is therefore suggested that you do them within time. In M.A. Second year you will have to do a total of 4 assignments (MHI-03, MHI-06, MHI-08, MHI-09, MHI-10, MPSE-003, MPSE-004).

MHI-109 INDIAL NATIONAL MOVEMENT

                                                                                                                              Course Code: MHI-109

Assignment Code: MHI-109/AST/TMA/2024-25

Total Marks: 100

Note: Attempt any five questions. The assignment is divided into two Sections 'A' and 'B'. You have to attempt at least two questions from each section in about 500 words each. All questions carry equal marks. 

Question 1. Compare the modernist and non-modernist theories about the emergence of nations and nationalism.

Ans. Theories of nations and nationalism have been the subject of extensive debate in the fields of political science, sociology, and history. These theories can broadly be divided into two categories: modernist and non-modernist. Both sets of theories offer different explanations for the emergence of nations and nationalism, focusing on various factors such as historical processes, cultural identities, and social structures.

Modernist Theories

Modernist theories assert that nations and nationalism are products of modernity, arising from specific historical, economic, and social developments that began in the late 18th century. These theories emphasize the role of industrialization, state formation, and cultural standardization in the creation of nations.

1. Ernest Gellner: Nationalism and Modernization

• Key Idea: Gellner argued that nationalism is a result of the social conditions created by industrialization. As societies moved from agrarian to industrial economies, there was a need for a standardized culture and language to ensure efficient communication and economic integration.
• Industrial Society: In an industrial society, the state plays a crucial role in providing a standardized education system that promotes a common language and culture. This cultural homogeneity is essential for a modern economy, where workers and citizens need to interact seamlessly.
• Nation as a Construct: Gellner viewed nations as constructs that arise from the demands of industrial society, rather than as organic or primordial entities.

2. Benedict Anderson: Imagined Communities

• Key Idea: Anderson famously described the nation as an "imagined community." He argued that nations are socially constructed through shared experiences and a sense of belonging among people who may never meet each other.
• Print Capitalism: The rise of print capitalism, particularly the proliferation of newspapers and novels, played a crucial role in creating a shared national consciousness. By reading the same texts, people began to see themselves as part of a larger, unified community.
• Language and Identity: Anderson emphasized the importance of a shared language in fostering national identity. As people read in a common language, they developed a sense of belonging to the same nation.

3. Eric Hobsbawm: Invented Traditions

• Key Idea: Hobsbawm argued that many national traditions are "invented" rather than rooted in ancient history. These traditions are consciously created by states or elites to foster a sense of national identity.
• Role of the State: The state plays a key role in promoting these invented traditions through education, public ceremonies, and symbols such as flags and anthems. These practices help to create a unified national identity, often in the service of political goals.
• Historical Process: Hobsbawm viewed nations and nationalism as products of modern historical processes, particularly the needs of the modern state to create loyal citizens.

Non-Modernist Theories

Non-modernist theories challenge the idea that nations and nationalism are exclusively modern phenomena. They emphasize the deep-rooted, often pre-modern origins of national identities and argue that nations can be seen as continuations or revivals of older ethnic, cultural, or religious communities.

1. Primordialism

• Key Idea: Primordialists argue that nations are rooted in ancient, pre-modern ethnic communities (ethnies) that have persisted over time. According to this view, nationalism is an expression of these deep-seated, historical identities.
• Ethnic Ties: Primordialists believe that nations are based on natural, given ties such as blood, language, religion, and shared history. These ties create a strong sense of belonging and solidarity that predates modernity.
• Continuity: Rather than seeing nations as modern constructs, primordialists view them as enduring entities that have existed in some form throughout history.

2. Ethnosymbolism (Anthony D. Smith)

• Key Idea: Anthony D. Smith, a leading proponent of ethnosymbolism, argued that nations are based on pre-modern ethnic communities and symbols that have been reinterpreted and adapted in modern times.
• Myths and Symbols: According to Smith, the myths, memories, symbols, and traditions of an ethnic community play a crucial role in the formation of a nation. These cultural elements provide continuity between the past and present, making the nation feel ancient and rooted.
• Nation-Building: While Smith acknowledged the role of modern processes like state-building, he emphasized that these processes often draw on pre-existing ethnic identities and cultural symbols to create a sense of nationhood.

3. Perennialism

• Key Idea: Perennialists argue that nations are neither purely modern constructs nor ancient primordial entities, but rather entities that have existed in different forms across different historical periods.
• Long-Lasting Communities: Perennialists see nations as long-lasting communities that have been shaped by historical forces, but they reject the idea that nations are exclusively modern. Instead, they argue that nations have existed in various forms, evolving over time in response to changing conditions.
• Hybrid Approach: This perspective often blends elements of both modernist and primordialist theories, acknowledging the role of modernity in shaping nations while also recognizing the importance of historical continuity and deep-rooted identities.

Comparison of Modernist and Non-Modernist Theories

• Origins of Nations:

  • Modernists see nations as products of modernity, emerging from the socio-economic and political changes of the modern era.
  • Non-modernists argue that nations have older, often pre-modern origins, rooted in ethnic or cultural communities that predate the modern state.

• Role of the State:

  • Modernist theories emphasize the role of the modern state in creating and promoting national identity through institutions like education and the military.
  • Non-modernists acknowledge the state's role but argue that it often builds on pre-existing ethnic or cultural identities.

• Continuity vs. Construction:

  • Modernists view nations as constructed entities, often created or imagined through processes like print capitalism, state-building, and the invention of traditions.
  • Non-modernists emphasize continuity, arguing that nations are based on longstanding cultural, ethnic, or religious communities that have existed for centuries.

• Cultural and Social Elements:

  • Modernists focus on the socio-economic and political factors that give rise to nations, such as industrialization, capitalism, and state centralization.
  • Non-modernists highlight the importance of cultural and symbolic elements, such as myths, memories, and traditions, in the formation of national identities.

Conclusion

Modernist and non-modernist theories offer different perspectives on the emergence of nations and nationalism, each with its strengths and limitations. Modernist theories provide a compelling explanation of how nations emerged in response to the demands of modernity, while non-modernist theories emphasize the deep-rooted and enduring nature of national identities. Together, these theories offer a comprehensive understanding of the complex and multifaceted phenomenon of nationalism, highlighting both its modern innovations and its historical continuities.

Get Complete Ignou Solved Assignment Files for 2024-2025 Call Now - 9643289714 or Click <<IGNOU Assignment File HardCopy>>

Question 2. Discuss the nature of the Khilafat movement and its role in the Non-cooperation movement.

Ans. The Khilafat Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement were two intertwined political movements in early 20th-century India that played a crucial role in the struggle for independence from British rule. Both movements were marked by their mass mobilization and shared goals, yet they arose from different motivations and contexts. Here's a detailed discussion of the nature of the Khilafat Movement and its role in the Non-Cooperation Movement:

Nature of the Khilafat Movement

The Khilafat Movement (1919-1924) was a pan-Islamic, anti-colonial political campaign launched by Muslims in British India in response to the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, particularly the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), which dismantled the Ottoman territories. The movement was centered around the preservation of the Ottoman Caliphate, which was a significant symbol of religious and political leadership for Muslims worldwide.

1. Religious and Political Roots

• Religious Concerns: The Ottoman Sultan was considered the Caliph (spiritual leader) of the Muslim world. The weakening and eventual abolition of the Caliphate by the Allies and the subsequent Treaty of Sèvres alarmed Muslims in India, who saw it as an attack on their religious identity.
• Pan-Islamic Sentiment: The movement was part of a broader pan-Islamic sentiment that sought to unify Muslims globally under a common religious and political cause. This sentiment was particularly strong among the educated Muslim elite in India.

2. Leadership and Mobilization

• Leadership: The Khilafat Movement was led by prominent Muslim leaders such as Maulana Mohammad Ali, Maulana Shaukat Ali, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad. They were supported by a broad spectrum of the Muslim community, including religious scholars (ulema) and political activists.
• Mass Mobilization: The movement gained widespread support among Indian Muslims, particularly in the northern and western regions. Mass rallies, meetings, and protests were organized to express solidarity with the Caliphate and to demand the preservation of its authority.

3. Objectives and Demands

• Restoration of the Caliphate: The primary objective was to pressure the British government and the Allies to restore the Ottoman Caliphate's authority and preserve the territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire.
• Protection of Muslim Interests: The movement also sought to protect Muslim interests in India by asserting their political and religious rights under British colonial rule.

Role of the Khilafat Movement in the Non-Cooperation Movement

The Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922), led by Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress, was a broader struggle against British rule in India. It aimed to achieve self-governance (Swaraj) by withdrawing Indian cooperation with British institutions, including the legal, educational, and economic systems. The Khilafat Movement became closely aligned with this broader nationalist struggle, resulting in a unique and significant partnership between the two movements.

1. Alliance with the Indian National Congress

• Gandhi's Support: Mahatma Gandhi saw the Khilafat Movement as an opportunity to unite Hindus and Muslims in the struggle against British rule. He extended his support to the Khilafat leaders, and in return, they joined the Congress-led Non-Cooperation Movement.
• Shared Goals: Although the Khilafat Movement had specific religious goals, both movements shared the common objective of challenging British imperialism. This alignment allowed for a significant increase in mass participation across religious and regional lines.

2. Mass Mobilization and Participation

• Widespread Protests: The Khilafat and Non-Cooperation Movements saw widespread participation across India. Muslims and Hindus came together in protests, boycotts of British goods, and the refusal to participate in colonial institutions. This unprecedented unity created a powerful anti-colonial front.
• National Impact: The combined efforts of both movements brought the struggle for Indian independence into the homes of millions of Indians, making it a truly mass movement. This period witnessed the spread of nationalist sentiment to the rural and urban masses, transcending religious and social barriers.

3. Significance and Challenges

• Strengthening Hindu-Muslim Unity: The Khilafat Movement played a significant role in fostering Hindu-Muslim unity during the early 1920s. This was one of the few instances in Indian history where large sections of both communities participated together in a common political struggle.
• Limitations and Decline: Despite the initial success in uniting communities, the Khilafat Movement began to lose momentum after the abolition of the Caliphate by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in Turkey in 1924. The communal unity that had been fostered started to unravel as the focus shifted back to more localized concerns and religious identities.

4. Impact on Indian Nationalism

• Swaraj and Civil Disobedience: The Khilafat Movement’s alliance with the Non-Cooperation Movement played a crucial role in popularizing the idea of Swaraj (self-rule) and civil disobedience against British authority. The partnership demonstrated the potential power of mass mobilization and non-violent resistance.
• Legacy: Although the Khilafat Movement itself did not achieve its immediate objectives, it left a lasting impact on Indian nationalism. It highlighted the potential for cross-religious collaboration in the anti-colonial struggle, even though such unity would later prove difficult to maintain.

Conclusion

The Khilafat Movement was a significant chapter in India's freedom struggle, representing a unique intersection of religious and political activism. Its alliance with the Non-Cooperation Movement underscored the possibilities and challenges of uniting diverse communities under a common anti-colonial cause. While the movement eventually lost its relevance after the abolition of the Caliphate, its role in the early 1920s was crucial in shaping the trajectory of the Indian independence movement and in demonstrating the power of mass mobilization and non-cooperation as tools for political change

Get Complete Ignou Solved Assignment Files for 2024-2025 Call Now - 9643289714 or Click <<IGNOU Assignment File HardCopy>>

Question 3. Write a note on the Revolt of 1857.

Question 4. Analyse the successes and failures of the Civil Disobedience Movement.

Ans. The Civil Disobedience Movement (1930-1934) was a crucial phase in India's struggle for independence from British rule, marked by widespread nonviolent resistance against colonial laws, taxes, and authority. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, this movement built on the momentum of previous campaigns like the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922) and aimed to challenge British rule more directly. The movement had significant successes in mobilizing the masses and shaking the foundations of British authority, but it also faced notable challenges and limitations.

Successes of the Civil Disobedience Movement

1. Mass Mobilization

• Widespread Participation: The Civil Disobedience Movement saw unprecedented participation from a broad spectrum of Indian society, including peasants, women, students, merchants, and workers. The movement spread across rural and urban areas, bringing millions into the struggle for independence.
• Involvement of Women: The movement marked a significant increase in women's participation in the nationalist struggle. Women played a prominent role in picketing liquor shops, participating in salt marches, and boycotting foreign goods, thereby expanding the movement’s social base.

2. Salt Satyagraha and Symbolic Acts

• Dandi March: The Salt Satyagraha, initiated by Gandhi with the famous Dandi March in March 1930, was a powerful symbolic act of defiance against the British salt laws. Gandhi's march to the sea to produce salt galvanized the nation and drew international attention to the Indian independence struggle.
• Defiance of Colonial Laws: The movement involved mass defiance of various colonial laws, such as the refusal to pay taxes, boycott of British goods, and non-cooperation with British institutions. These acts of civil disobedience demonstrated the Indian population’s resolve to challenge British authority.

3. Economic Impact

• Boycott of British Goods: The boycott of British goods, particularly cloth, significantly impacted British economic interests in India. Indian industries, especially handloom textiles, received a boost as a result of the boycott.
• Disruption of Revenue: The refusal to pay taxes, especially land revenue, in certain regions disrupted the colonial administration's revenue collection, putting financial pressure on the British government.

4. International Attention

• Global Awareness: The movement attracted significant international attention, particularly in the Western media. Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance and the widespread participation of ordinary Indians in the movement gained sympathy and support for India’s cause worldwide.
• Pressure on British Authorities: The global attention and domestic unrest pressured the British government to engage with Indian leaders. The Round Table Conferences (1930-1932) were convened partly in response to the movement’s impact, although these negotiations ultimately failed to achieve a breakthrough.

5. Strengthening the Nationalist Movement

• Unity and Consciousness: The movement strengthened the sense of national unity and political consciousness among Indians. It created a deeper sense of participation in the nationalist struggle, not just among elites but also among the masses.
• Revitalization of the Indian National Congress: The movement revitalized the Indian National Congress, which emerged as the leading force in the independence struggle, further solidifying its role as the representative of the Indian people.

Failures of the Civil Disobedience Movement

1. Limited Achievements

• No Immediate Political Gains: Despite the mass mobilization and international attention, the movement did not achieve its immediate goals. The British government did not concede to the demands for full independence or even significant autonomy. The movement was eventually called off in 1934 without any substantial concessions from the British.
• Failure of the Round Table Conferences: The Round Table Conferences, which were intended to address the constitutional future of India, failed to reach any agreement on key issues, such as the demand for Dominion Status or the framing of a new constitution.

2. Repression and Violence

• British Repression: The British authorities responded to the movement with harsh repression, including mass arrests, lathi charges, and the imposition of martial law in several areas. Gandhi and other leaders were imprisoned, which temporarily weakened the movement.
• Outbreaks of Violence: Although the movement was intended to be nonviolent, there were several instances of violence, such as attacks on police stations, looting, and clashes between protesters and the police. These outbreaks undermined the nonviolent principles of the movement and provided the British with a pretext to suppress it.

3. Lack of Unity and Coordination

• Regional and Class Divisions: The movement faced challenges in maintaining unity across different regions and social classes. While some regions and communities participated enthusiastically, others were less engaged. The movement did not uniformly affect all parts of India, leading to varying levels of impact and success.
• Inconsistent Support: Certain sections of Indian society, such as the princely states, large landowners, and some industrialists, did not fully support the movement. The lack of a cohesive strategy to bring these groups into the fold limited the movement’s effectiveness.

4. Alienation of Minorities

• Muslim Discontent: The Civil Disobedience Movement did not enjoy the same level of Muslim participation as previous movements. The growing estrangement between the Congress and the Muslim League, as well as the lack of specific provisions for Muslim concerns, led to a decline in Muslim support for the Congress-led nationalist movement.
• Ambedkar and Dalits: The movement also failed to adequately address the concerns of Dalits (then referred to as "Depressed Classes"), leading to tensions between Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar, a prominent Dalit leader. Ambedkar’s demand for separate electorates for Dalits created a significant rift, which was only partially resolved by the Poona Pact of 1932.

5. End of the Movement

• Withdrawal and Decline: Gandhi’s decision to suspend the movement in 1934, following a series of setbacks and internal disagreements, led to a decline in the momentum that had been built up. The withdrawal was seen by some as a strategic retreat, but it also reflected the movement's limitations in achieving its goals.

Conclusion

The Civil Disobedience Movement was a significant chapter in India’s struggle for independence, marked by both successes and failures. It succeeded in mobilizing millions of Indians across different social strata, challenging British authority, and drawing international attention to India’s quest for freedom. However, it also faced significant challenges, including repression by the British, internal divisions, and limited immediate political gains. Despite these setbacks, the movement laid the groundwork for future struggles and helped to solidify the Indian National Congress’s leadership in the fight for independence. Ultimately, while the Civil Disobedience Movement did not achieve its immediate goals, it played a crucial role in sustaining the momentum of the Indian nationalist movement and bringing the country closer to eventual independence in 1947.

Get Complete Ignou Solved Assignment Files for 2024-2025 Call Now - 9643289714 or Click <<IGNOU Assignment File HardCopy>>

Question 5. Write short notes on any two of the following. Answer in about 250 words each.

a) The Subaltern View on Indian National Movement

b) Political mobilisation in the Princely States

c) Political ideas of the Swaraj Party

d) Achievements of the Congress Ministries during 1937-39.

Get Complete Ignou Solved Assignment Files for 2024-2025 Call Now - 9643289714 or Click <<IGNOU Assignment File HardCopy>>

Question 6. Discuss the prelude to the Quit India Movement. What was the impact of the Quit India Movement?

Ans. The Quit India Movement of 1942, one of the most significant movements in India’s struggle for independence, did not arise spontaneously. It was the result of a series of political developments and growing dissatisfaction with British rule, exacerbated by the events of World War II. The movement, although brutally suppressed, had a profound impact on the course of Indian independence.

Prelude to the Quit India Movement

The backdrop to the Quit India Movement was shaped by several key factors:

1. World War II and India’s Involvement

• India’s Forced Participation: In September 1939, when Britain declared war on Germany, India was automatically dragged into the conflict without any consultation with Indian leaders. This unilateral decision by the British government was deeply resented by the Indian National Congress and other political groups, who saw it as yet another example of colonial arrogance and disregard for Indian opinion.
• Congress’s Response: The Congress, led by leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi, demanded that India’s support for the war effort be conditional on Britain granting India full independence or at least substantial autonomy. When these demands were ignored, the Congress ministries in the provinces resigned in protest in October 1939.

2. August Offer (1940)

• British Attempt at Conciliation: In response to growing unrest, the British government made the August Offer in 1940, promising to include more Indians in the Executive Council and to establish a representative body to frame a new constitution after the war. However, the offer fell far short of Congress’s demands, particularly as it did not include immediate independence.
• Rejection by Congress: The Congress rejected the August Offer, considering it insufficient and non-committal, while the Muslim League, under Muhammad Ali Jinnah, saw it as a step toward securing Muslim interests.

3. Cripps Mission (1942)

• British Diplomatic Effort: In March 1942, Sir Stafford Cripps, a member of the British War Cabinet, was sent to India with a new proposal, known as the Cripps Mission. It promised Dominion Status after the war and the establishment of an elected body to frame a new constitution. However, it also contained provisions that allowed provinces to opt out of the union, which alarmed Congress and other nationalists.
• Failure of the Cripps Mission: The Congress rejected the Cripps proposals because they did not meet the demand for immediate self-rule and because of the divisive clause allowing provinces to secede. The failure of the Cripps Mission heightened frustrations and convinced many Indian leaders that more decisive action was necessary.

4. Growing Discontent and Economic Hardship

• War-Induced Hardships: The war had caused severe economic hardship in India, including inflation, shortages of essential goods, and increased taxes. The effects were particularly devastating in rural areas, where farmers were forced to sell their produce at low prices, leading to widespread poverty and famine-like conditions.
• Rising Unrest: Discontent was growing not only among the Congress leaders but also among the general population. There were widespread strikes, protests, and unrest, reflecting the deepening frustration with British rule.

5. Mahatma Gandhi’s Role and Call for Action

• Gandhi’s Radicalization: By 1942, Gandhi had become increasingly radicalized, convinced that British rule in India must end immediately. He saw the British war effort as morally bankrupt and argued that India could no longer wait for independence.
• ‘Do or Die’ Slogan: Gandhi articulated his vision for the Quit India Movement in his famous speech on August 8, 1942, at the All India Congress Committee (AICC) session in Bombay. He gave the clarion call to the British to “Quit India” and urged Indians to “Do or Die” in their fight for freedom. This speech marked the formal launch of the Quit India Movement.

Impact of the Quit India Movement

The Quit India Movement had a profound impact on the Indian independence struggle, despite its initial failure to achieve immediate political objectives.

1. Mass Uprising and Popular Resistance

• Widespread Participation: The Quit India Movement sparked a massive, nationwide uprising. People from all walks of life—students, workers, peasants, women, and even children—took part in protests, strikes, and acts of civil disobedience. The movement spread rapidly across urban and rural areas, leading to widespread disruption of British administrative functions.
• Underground Activities: With most of the top Congress leaders, including Gandhi, Nehru, and Patel, arrested immediately after the movement was launched, leadership fell to a younger generation of activists who organized underground resistance. They resorted to sabotage, cutting communication lines, derailing trains, and distributing anti-British propaganda.

2. Repression by the British Government

• Brutal Suppression: The British response was swift and brutal. The government declared the Congress an unlawful organization, arrested thousands of its leaders and activists, and resorted to mass detentions, public shootings, and widespread use of violence to crush the movement.
• Censorship and Control: The British imposed strict censorship on the press, restricted public meetings, and used propaganda to discredit the movement. Despite this, the intensity of the resistance continued, especially in rural areas.

3. Significance for Indian Nationalism

• Heightened National Consciousness: The movement significantly heightened national consciousness and deepened the resolve of Indians to achieve independence. Even though it was suppressed, the Quit India Movement demonstrated the Indian people’s willingness to resist British rule at any cost.
• Strengthening of Anti-Colonial Sentiment: The brutal suppression of the movement exposed the oppressive nature of British colonialism to the world and strengthened anti-colonial sentiments within India. It also highlighted the deep-seated desire for independence among the Indian masses.

4. End of British Credibility

• British Authority Undermined: Although the British managed to suppress the movement, the Quit India uprising severely undermined their credibility and control over India. It became increasingly clear that British rule was unsustainable in the face of such widespread opposition.
• Prelude to Independence: The movement marked a turning point in the Indian independence struggle. While it did not achieve immediate freedom, it set the stage for India’s eventual independence in 1947 by demonstrating that the British could no longer rely on Indian cooperation to govern the country.

5. International Impact

• Global Sympathy for India: The movement attracted global attention and sympathy for India’s cause. The harsh British response, coupled with Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance, won India international support, particularly in the United States and other Allied nations.

6. Role in Post-War Negotiations

• Pressure on Britain: The Quit India Movement, coupled with the changing global dynamics after World War II, put immense pressure on Britain to negotiate with Indian leaders. The British government realized that maintaining control over India was becoming increasingly difficult, both politically and economically.
• Foundation for the Transfer of Power: The movement laid the foundation for subsequent negotiations, leading to the Cabinet Mission of 1946 and eventually the transfer of power in 1947. The Quit India Movement, despite its immediate failure, made it clear that the British would have to leave India sooner rather than later.

Conclusion

The Quit India Movement was a pivotal event in India’s struggle for independence. While it did not achieve its immediate objective of ending British rule, it played a crucial role in mobilizing the masses, undermining British authority, and setting the stage for India’s eventual independence. The movement’s legacy lies in its demonstration of the Indian people’s unyielding determination to attain freedom and the inevitability of British withdrawal from India.

Get Complete Ignou Solved Assignment Files for 2024-2025 Call Now - 9643289714 or Click <<IGNOU Assignment File HardCopy>>

Question 7. Discuss the association of nationalism with the peasant movements in UP and Bihar during the 1920s and 1930s.

Question 8. How did the Gandhian method of mass mobilisation succeed in bringing women into public life?

Ans. Mahatma Gandhi's method of mass mobilization was transformative in many ways, particularly in how it brought women into public life and the nationalist movement. Prior to Gandhi’s influence, the participation of women in India’s political sphere was minimal, largely due to social norms and traditional roles that confined them to domestic life. However, Gandhi’s approach to mass mobilization, which emphasized nonviolence, simplicity, and the involvement of all sections of society, played a crucial role in encouraging women to step out of their traditional roles and participate actively in the struggle for independence. Here’s how Gandhian methods succeeded in this regard:

1. Inclusivity of the Freedom Struggle

• Nonviolent Satyagraha: Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance, or Satyagraha, was inherently inclusive and accessible to everyone, regardless of gender. The nonviolent nature of the struggle allowed women, who were often viewed as more peaceable and nurturing, to participate actively without resorting to violence, which was seen as more masculine.
• Moral and Ethical Appeal: Gandhi’s emphasis on moral and ethical principles resonated with many women, particularly those who saw the struggle for independence as a righteous cause. This appeal to morality encouraged women to participate in the public sphere, not just as supporters but as active participants in the movement.

2. Reframing Women’s Role in Society

• Gandhi’s View on Women’s Strength: Gandhi viewed women as inherently powerful due to their capacity for self-sacrifice, patience, and nonviolence. He often referred to women as the embodiment of Shakti (strength) and encouraged them to see their traditional roles of nurturing and caregiving as sources of power rather than as limitations.
• Promotion of Women’s Empowerment: Gandhi promoted the idea that women’s participation in the nationalist movement was a form of empowerment. He argued that by stepping into the public domain and contributing to the national cause, women were reclaiming their rightful place in society.

3. Practical Involvement in Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience Movements

• Participation in Boycotts: Women were actively involved in boycotting British goods, particularly foreign cloth. Gandhi’s emphasis on Swadeshi (the use of indigenous goods) resonated with women, who took up the spinning wheel (charkha) as a symbol of resistance. Women across the country participated in spinning khadi (handwoven cloth) and organizing boycotts, which were key aspects of Gandhi’s economic strategy against British rule.
• Picketing and Protests: Women took part in picketing liquor shops and foreign goods stores, activities that were central to the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922) and the Civil Disobedience Movement (1930-1934). Their involvement in these public protests was a significant departure from traditional norms and marked their entry into the public sphere.

4. Role in the Salt Satyagraha

• Dandi March and Salt Protests: The Salt Satyagraha of 1930, initiated by Gandhi’s famous Dandi March, saw massive participation from women. Thousands of women joined the movement by making salt, selling it, and organizing protests against the salt laws. This participation was not just symbolic; it represented a direct challenge to British authority by women.
• Leadership Roles: Women like Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay, Sarojini Naidu, and others emerged as prominent leaders during the Salt Satyagraha. Sarojini Naidu, for instance, led a group of women to the salt works at Dharasana, where they faced brutal repression from the police. These acts of courage and leadership by women gained widespread recognition and inspired more women to join the movement.

5. Gandhi’s Personal Influence

• Gandhi as a Role Model: Gandhi’s own lifestyle, which emphasized simplicity, humility, and self-discipline, appealed to many women. His encouragement and personal interactions with women leaders like Kasturba Gandhi, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, and Aruna Asaf Ali inspired them to take on active roles in the movement.
• Women’s Conferences and Organizations: Gandhi encouraged the formation of women’s organizations and the holding of women’s conferences, where issues related to women’s rights and their role in the freedom struggle were discussed. These forums provided a platform for women to voice their concerns and contribute to the nationalist discourse.

6. Changing Social Norms

• Challenging Patriarchy: Gandhi’s movement subtly challenged patriarchal norms by promoting the idea that women were equal partners in the struggle for independence. By involving women in activities like spinning, protesting, and social reform, Gandhi helped break down the traditional barriers that confined women to domestic roles.
• Educating Women: Gandhi also emphasized the importance of women’s education and self-reliance. He believed that educated and self-reliant women would be better equipped to contribute to the nation’s progress and to assert their rights within society.

7. Impact on Future Movements

• Legacy of Women’s Participation: The involvement of women in the Gandhian movements laid the groundwork for their continued participation in public life, even after independence. The experience gained by women during the freedom struggle empowered them to take on leadership roles in post-independence India, in areas such as politics, social reform, and education.
• Symbol of Women’s Empowerment: The image of women participating in the Gandhian movements became a powerful symbol of women’s empowerment in India. It challenged the traditional view of women as passive and submissive, replacing it with a new image of women as active agents of change.

Conclusion

Gandhi’s method of mass mobilization was instrumental in bringing women into public life in India. By emphasizing nonviolence, inclusivity, and the moral and ethical dimensions of the struggle, Gandhi created a space for women to participate actively in the nationalist movement. The involvement of women in various aspects of the freedom struggle not only contributed to the success of these movements but also marked a significant shift in Indian society, paving the way for greater gender equality and the empowerment of women in the years to come.

Get Complete Ignou Solved Assignment Files for 2024-2025 Call Now - 9643289714 or Click <<IGNOU Assignment File HardCopy>>

Question 9. Analyse the main strengths and weaknesses of the legacies of the Indian national movement.

Ans. The Indian national movement, which spanned several decades and culminated in the country’s independence from British rule in 1947, left behind a complex legacy. This legacy encompasses both significant strengths and notable weaknesses, which have shaped India’s post-independence trajectory in various ways.

Strengths of the Legacies of the Indian National Movement

1. Achievement of Independence

• End of Colonial Rule: The most significant strength of the Indian national movement was its success in ending British colonial rule and securing India’s independence. This achievement marked the culmination of years of struggle and sacrifice by millions of Indians and was a major victory for anti-colonial movements worldwide.
• Foundation of a Sovereign State: The movement laid the groundwork for the establishment of a sovereign democratic state, setting the stage for India to become a republic with its own constitution, legal system, and governance structures.

2. Promotion of Democratic Values

• Constitutional Democracy: The movement's emphasis on democratic principles led to the establishment of a democratic political system in India. The Indian Constitution, adopted in 1950, enshrined fundamental rights, democratic governance, and the rule of law, reflecting the values and ideals promoted during the nationalist struggle.
• Political Participation: The movement fostered a culture of political participation and engagement among the Indian populace. The widespread involvement of ordinary people in the struggle helped to democratize political activism and encouraged civic involvement.

3. National Unity and Identity

• Sense of Nationalism: The national movement played a crucial role in fostering a sense of national unity and identity. By uniting people across different regions, religions, and languages against colonial rule, the movement helped to create a shared sense of Indian identity.
• Cultural Renaissance: The struggle for independence also saw a revival of Indian culture and heritage. Leaders like Gandhi, Nehru, and Tagore emphasized the importance of Indian cultural traditions and values, contributing to a sense of pride and cultural rejuvenation.

4. Social Reform and Empowerment

• Social Justice: The nationalist movement addressed several social issues, including caste discrimination and gender inequality. Leaders like B.R. Ambedkar and Gandhi advocated for the rights of Dalits and women, contributing to social reform and greater awareness of social justice issues.
• Empowerment of Women: The involvement of women in the movement helped to challenge traditional gender roles and contributed to the gradual empowerment of women in post-independence India.

5. Global Influence

• Inspiration for Other Movements: The Indian national movement inspired other anti-colonial and liberation movements around the world. Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance, in particular, had a profound impact on global movements for social and political change.

Weaknesses of the Legacies of the Indian National Movement

1. Partition and Communal Tensions

• Impact of Partition: The legacy of the nationalist movement is marred by the traumatic partition of India and Pakistan in 1947. The partition led to massive displacement, communal violence, and significant loss of life, leaving a lasting impact on both countries.
• Lingering Communalism: The partition also exacerbated communal tensions in India, which have persisted in various forms since independence. The legacy of communalism and religious division remains a challenge for Indian society and politics.

2. Political and Economic Challenges

• Political Instability: The immediate post-independence period was marked by political instability and conflict. The nascent Indian state faced challenges related to governance, administration, and integration of princely states.
• Economic Development: Despite the movement’s success in achieving independence, India faced significant economic challenges in the post-independence era. Issues such as poverty, underdevelopment, and economic inequality continued to pose difficulties for the new nation.

3. Exclusionary Aspects of Nationalism

• Neglect of Minority Rights: While the nationalist movement emphasized unity, it often marginalized the concerns of religious and ethnic minorities. The lack of adequate provisions for minority rights in the early years of independence led to tensions and conflicts.
• Regional Disparities: The focus on national unity sometimes overshadowed regional identities and concerns. The movement’s centralization of power contributed to regional disparities and demands for greater autonomy in various states.

4. Gaps in Social Reforms

• Inadequate Implementation of Reforms: While the movement advocated for social reforms, such as the upliftment of Dalits and women’s empowerment, the implementation of these reforms has been uneven. Many social inequalities and injustices persisted in the post-independence period.
• Economic Inequality: Despite efforts to promote social justice, economic inequality remained a significant issue. The benefits of economic development were not evenly distributed, leading to persistent disparities between different sections of society.

5. Complexity of Political Legacy

• Challenges of Secularism: The legacy of secularism promoted by the nationalist movement has faced challenges in practice. The ideal of a secular state has been tested by various political and social developments, leading to debates and controversies regarding the role of religion in public life.
• Political Corruption and Inefficiency: The legacy of the movement has also been affected by issues of political corruption and inefficiency. The early promise of clean and accountable governance has been undermined by various instances of corruption and administrative challenges.

Conclusion

The legacies of the Indian national movement are both profound and complex. On one hand, the movement succeeded in ending colonial rule, promoting democratic values, fostering national unity, and inspiring global struggles for freedom. On the other hand, it also left behind challenges related to partition, communal tensions, political and economic difficulties, and gaps in social reforms. Understanding both the strengths and weaknesses of these legacies is crucial for addressing the ongoing issues and shaping the future trajectory of India.

Get Complete Ignou Solved Assignment Files for 2024-2025 Call Now - 9643289714 or Click <<IGNOU Assignment File HardCopy>>

Question 10. Write short notes on any two of the following. Answer in about 250 words each:

a) Role of the Constituent Assembly, 1946-49

b) Poona Pact, 1932

c) Nationalists and the Workers in the Early Phase

d) Pakistan Demand and its Consequences.

Get IGNOU GUIDE BOOKS/ HELP BOOKS/ REFERENCE BOOKS CLICK (BUY GUIDE BOOKS)

Thank You for Reading